On 01/06/14 14:38, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
>
> This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called
> cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqv...@spectrumdigital.se>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> index 053b98e..c67f5c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static int __init msm_console_setup(struct console *co,
> char *options)
> {
> struct uart_port *port;
> struct msm_port *msm_port;
> - int baud, flow, bits, parity;
> + int baud = 0, flow, bits, parity;
This made me wonder my "baud" is special compared to the other three
variables. In fact I don't really think it is special so setting "baud"
from the else clause in the uninitialized branch makes more sense to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
