On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Olav Haugan wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 3:48 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > iirc, one plan for 'flags' was some sort of DONT_FLUSH_TLB flag for
> > drivers which wanted to map/unmap N buffers with a single flush at the
> > end. There might have been some other usages envisioned.
>
> Yes, that was the original intent of the flags for now. I am sure we can
> find other uses for this in the future.
Do you have anything else in mind already besides the DONT_FLUSH_TLB
flag?
How is the IOTLB supposed to be flushed when this flag is used?
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
