On 7 October 2014 03:14, Mike Turquette <[email protected]> wrote: > Poorly worded question. I was asking if the above patch would work for > you and it seems the answer is yes. > > The reason I care is that I am working on a governor that needs to > know a driver flag. It would be painful for the machine-independent > governor to understand a machine-specific private data structure from > the driver. The flags are listed in cpufreq.h so it makes life easy.
This patch isn't required anymore by thomas. All he needs is a flag local to cpufreq-cpu0 driver and we didn't wanted to abuse cpufreq_driver's flag field for that.. So this patch is just for your work.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
