On 03/19/2015 04:16 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
Hi Rajendra,
Thanks for the patch!
On 03/19/2015 10:02 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
The common clk probe registers a clk provider and a reset controller.
Update it to register a genpd provider using the gdsc data provided
by each platform.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
drivers/clk/qcom/common.h | 2 ++
drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 9 ++++++++-
4 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
index a946b48..cc9f56f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/common.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "clk-rcg.h"
#include "clk-regmap.h"
#include "reset.h"
+#include "gdsc.h"
struct qcom_cc {
struct qcom_reset_controller reset;
@@ -125,8 +126,18 @@ int qcom_cc_really_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
ret = reset_controller_register(&reset->rcdev);
if (ret)
- of_clk_del_provider(dev->of_node);
+ goto err_reset;
+ ret = gdsc_register(dev, desc->gdscs, desc->num_gdscs, regmap);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_pd;
+
+ return 0;
+err_pd:
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to register power domains\n");
+ reset_controller_unregister(&reset->rcdev);
+err_reset:
+ of_clk_del_provider(dev->of_node);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_cc_really_probe);
@@ -145,6 +156,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_cc_probe);
void qcom_cc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ of_genpd_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
It would be nice to introduce gdsc_unregister() for symmetry.
yeah I thought about adding it and then realized it would just call
of_genpd_del_provider() internally and not do anything much.
But I guess I can add one if that makes it look more symmetric.
of_clk_del_provider(pdev->dev.of_node);
reset_controller_unregister(platform_get_drvdata(pdev));
}
<snip>
+
+int gdsc_register(struct device *dev, struct gdsc **scs, size_t num,
+ struct regmap *regmap)
+{
Could you squash implementation of this function with the first patch 1/6.
yup, will do.
+ int i, ret;
+ struct genpd_onecell_data *data;
+
+ if (!num || !scs || !dev || !dev->of_node)
+ return 0;
+
+ data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ data->domains = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data->domains) * num,
+ GFP_KERNEL);
Just wondering, are there some obstacles to embed struct
genpd_onecell_data in struct gdsc, and thus avoid having two memory
allocations?
Its just that we dont need one genpd_onecell_data per gdsc instance.
We only have one provider and hence just need one instance.
regards,
Rajendra
+ if (!data->domains)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ data->num_domains = num;
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+ if (!scs[i])
+ continue;
+ scs[i]->regmap = regmap;
+ ret = gdsc_init(scs[i]);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ data->domains[i] = &scs[i]->pd;
+ }
+ return of_genpd_add_provider_onecell(dev->of_node, data);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
index ac6a2d5..14de304 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
@@ -32,5 +32,12 @@ struct gdsc {
#define domain_to_gdsc(domain) container_of(domain, struct gdsc, pd)
This is used only from gdsc.c, please move it there.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
