> On 07/29, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> On 07/29/2015 06:34 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > >> >Sorry, I read the thread and I tried to understand what was going on >> but >> >I'm still lost. Can you clarify further in the commit text somehow? >> >> So I can add this in the commit text, if it seems fine >> >> "The use of pm_clk_add_notifier() isn't appropriate here since we need >> to only manage clocks with valid power domain associations done via >> DT, instead of what pm_clk_add_notifier() does, which is manage clocks >> for all on SoC/off SoC devices associating all of them to a dummy >> power domain instead" >> > > Yes that's good, thanks. But I still wonder why the code isn't > generic so that we don't have lots of drivers duplicating the > same logic. I guess we can consolidate another day.
Yes, the code is quite generic and probably needs to be some place so it can be resued across drivers. For now I don;t see anyone else needing it, maybe sh mobile might plan to use something like it at a later time which is when we should probably consolidate. -- QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
