On Mon, Nov 23 2015 at 06:42 -0700, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Montag, den 23.11.2015, 14:31 +0100 schrieb Lucas Stach:
Am Mittwoch, den 18.11.2015, 07:57 -0700 schrieb Lina Iyer:
> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+rene...@baylibre.com>
>
> The generic_pm_domain structure uses an array of latencies to be able to
> declare multiple intermediate states.
>
> Declare a single "OFF" state with the default latencies So that the
> power_off_latency_ns and power_on_latency_ns fields of generic_pm_domain
> structure can be eventualy removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam+rene...@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.i...@linaro.org>
> [Lina: pm_genpd_init() argument change]
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> index 8e7976a..b070e06 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/gpc.c
> @@ -368,13 +368,23 @@ static struct generic_pm_domain imx6q_arm_domain = {
> .name = "ARM",
> };
>
> +static struct genpd_power_state imx6q_arm_domain_states[] = {
Those states are for the PU, not the ARM domain.
> + {
> + .name = "OFF",
> + .power_off_latency_ns = 25000,
> + .power_on_latency_ns = 2000000,
> + },
> +};
> +
> static struct pu_domain imx6q_pu_domain = {
> .base = {
> .name = "PU",
> .power_off = imx6q_pm_pu_power_off,
> .power_on = imx6q_pm_pu_power_on,
> - .power_off_latency_ns = 25000,
> - .power_on_latency_ns = 2000000,
> + .gov = NULL,
> + .status = GPD_STATE_POWER_OFF,
The above 2 lines should not be needed. This is a static struct, so .gov
will already be NULL. status is set by pm_genpd_init() and the above
value is actively wrong.
True.
> + .states = imx6q_arm_domain_states,
> + .state_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx6q_arm_domain_states),
> },
> };
>
How urgent is this patch? I have a series to rework the GPC driver
almost ready and I could fold this change in directly if it's okay for
this to sit through a review of the rework.
And I just noticed this depends on changes that are not already in
v4.4-rc. Why is this sent as a single patch and not as part of the
series adding multiple state support to genpd?
Sorry, since this is ARM 32, I had not comple tested it when I sent out
the series. I sent this out after I realized it.
Thanks,
Lina
Regards,
Lucas
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
