>Yeah, I'm also curious what this error message means and how it is >triggered. Well, broadly speaking the `unrecognizable insn' thing means that an early pass of the compiler has generated an instruction that some later pass doesn't like the look of. The particular type of thing that Jeff is seeing has historically been caused by GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_INDEX and LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS disagreeing about what constitutes a valid load instruction, though I thought that particular problem was behind us now. Jeff, did you apply any extra patches to either compiler? I'm mildly surprised that 2.95.3 is actually worse than 2.95.2. p. _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm Please visit the above address for information on this list.
- Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Erik Mouw
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Philip Blundell
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Philip Blundell
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Philip Blundell
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Philip Blundell
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Erik Mouw
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Philip Blundell
- Re: Slight problem cross-compiling net-tools-1.60 Jeff Sutherland
