>Yeah, I'm also curious what this error message means and how it is
>triggered.

Well, broadly speaking the `unrecognizable insn' thing means that an early 
pass of the compiler has generated an instruction that some later pass doesn't 
like the look of.  The particular type of thing that Jeff is seeing has 
historically been caused by GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_INDEX and 
LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS disagreeing about what constitutes a valid load 
instruction, though I thought that particular problem was behind us now.

Jeff, did you apply any extra patches to either compiler?  I'm 
mildly surprised that 2.95.3 is actually worse than 2.95.2.

p.



_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
Please visit the above address for information on this list.

Reply via email to