What's the point in replying to your messages when you can't actually
receive them? It's just a waste of my time ultimately, and I'd rather
not waste my time.
Please note that I'm currently operating, and have been operating for
some time now a "one strike and your out" policy, brought on by the
shere number of broken or badly administered systems out there - this
is becoming a major problem for mailing list administrators to deal with.
This effectively means that if your email address happens to bounce with
a 5xx error code (in other words, a permanent failure) you _will_ without
fail be unsubscribed from these lists. If you resubscribe, and continue
to bounce, and it becomes soo regular that I have your email address
ingrained in my brain, I will prevent you even subscribing to the lists.
If it is a whole domain that is causing the problem, I'll prevent the
whole domain.
Sorry, but if your systems or your ISPs systems aren't able to play
properly on the Internet, don't expect to participate on the Internet.
It's as simple as that.
Luckily, shobhana isn't on any linux-arm related mailing lists, but its
worth pointing out the policy on these lists again.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:38 +0100
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:37 +0100
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host mail.in.ceeyes.com [65.192.85.133]: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User
unknown
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from [212.18.232.186] (helo=caramon.arm.linux.org.uk)
by smtp.mailbox.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2)
id 15mucw-0003ZH-00; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:14 +0100
Received: from flint.arm.linux.org.uk (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.0.4])
by caramon.arm.linux.org.uk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8SACDr21321;
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:13 +0100
Received: from linux by flint.arm.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.16 #1)
id 15mucu-0003Ry-00; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:12 +0100
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:12:12 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: shobhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Bharath Channakeshava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
ixp1200 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: getting problem with insmod
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<02e301c147fc$3bcb8990$0f09010a@shobhan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <02e301c147fc$3bcb8990$0f09010a@shobhan>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:31:57PM +0530
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 02:31:57PM +0530, shobhan wrote:
> i configured the kernel with the module options..
> i am here with attaching my .config file, please have a look .
Why did you hand edit the .config file?
It is not sufficient to merely edit this file to change the configuration
of the kernel. This is more than likely your problem. Follow the
instructions in the README and everything will work.
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
Please visit the above address for information on this list.
