On Wednesday 10 October 2001 17:55, you wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 05:32:12PM -0400, Philip Jones wrote: > > You just send this message to me personally without a CC to the > linux-arm list and now I see it over here as well without a CC to > myself. Please consider using a non-broken mailer that does show that > you CC messages to me or the mailing list. > Sorry, my fault, I had actually intended to just send it to the list, and I wouln't say that this client isn't broken in a number of areas. > > > I am including asm/hardware.h, compiling with -O2 and compiling against > > the proper kernel tree. Are there any other headers that might be > > critical? > > The usual stuff: linux/module.h, linux/kernel.h, and linux/init.h. > > > Is > > there a certain access mode the kernel module needs to be in to use > > physical memory instead of virtual memory? > > No, the CPU IO registers are mapped in kernel mode. > > What kernel version are you using? If it's a recent kernel, please send > some minimal test code that reveals the bug to the linux-arm-kernel > list. >
This is kernel 2.4.6.rmk1-np2, I do realise this is a bit out of date, but I'll have to do more testing to find out if it's a bug. I do not think it is a bug because everything else that accesses GPIO's in this manner, such as the uda1341 driver, has no problem with it. > > Erik _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm Please visit the above address for information on this list.
