On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 09:20:53AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem was the wrong configuration of the SMSC 9196 chip on board > (should use no wait state of course!). I haven't tested the overall > performance of the system. But netio reports about 800kb/s with this > display compared to 1000kb/s withoout display. > If anybody is interested in the settings I can post them here. > But I still have one problem: There are a few lines missing on the display > bottom regardles what >I set in the v/hsync timings. Any glue? Well it > isn't that importent since we don't use that display anyhow
The settings that are in the existing kernel are fine. Its a hardware problem which has come up before, maybe last year, or the year before on the mailing list. Basically, the resistor that pulls the wait line high is insufficient and leads to very long wait periods. _______________________________________________ http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm Please visit the above address for information on this list.
