Re: Linux 2.1.128 kernel patch

[Philip Blundell]

>up after sorting out this problem with Intel.  (If my suspicions are true,
>then it'll require a gruesome compiler hack which will increase the APCS 
>function entry considerably to reliably get around the problem).

What do you think the bug is, then?

>(since my sources must remain constant so that the problem is reproduceable).

I don't quite understand how this relates to `let(ting) on what it is'.

p.


unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]