The co285 port, as far as I know, changes other things to do
with memory mapping that won't always be desirable.
The co285 essentially is the ebsa-285 port with the kernel remapped. I
disabled the PCI code since it is not needed.
In any case, keeping the co285 and EBSA-285 ports as close
together as possible can only be a good thing. If a check like
this allows them to share the hw-ebsa285 code then all the
better.
Hopefully the difference between the two ports does not have to be more
than the different location of the kernel and the ioremap, ioread etc
functions.
Mark.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
