Re: Re(2): boot loader -- again

[Chris Rutter]

On Thu, 22 Apr 1999, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Is there a "preferred" way between target arm-linuxaout and arm-aout for
> the toolchain, or both will make it ? I was thinking about using
> arm-linuxaout so I can also generate linux binaries using the same
> toolchain, is there something wrong with this ?

The best I can think of is to build two separate toolchains, one with
the target name `arm-linuxaout' and one with `arm-linux', and then
reference them as such.  It would be possible, I suppose, to hack
binutils into supporting both..?

-- 
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                         ( http://www.fluff.org/chris )

unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]