Philip Blundell writes:
> First I tried changing `orrls' to `orrle' in the implementation of up() which
> seemed to improve things but not actually make everything work. I've appended
> below the patch that I ended up using which seems to do the trick but isn't
> very optimal.
Unfortunately, there is one rather big pitfall - the operation is no longer
atomic. Both the increment and the test must be done atomically wrt the
other atomic functions.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/armlinux.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
