Re: Question on syscall()

[Philip Blundell]

>The SP is pointing at the stacked r0, hence:

It's that bit that I didn't agree with.  It looked to me as though SP was 
pointing at the copy of R4 that had been pushed by the earlier syscall entry 
(ie the fifth argument to sys_syscall).  But maybe I overlooked something.

p.


unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]