> Would specifying the function as no_return avoid register saving? I think so, but you will then have to take care of actually doing the return yourself. > Any tips o what behaviour will result from this (so I can keep an >eye out for it)? I think the compiler will abort if it runs out of registers totally. It shouldn't generate bad code these days. >Also what optimisation levels are 'safe' for kernel >coding? I seem to remember some mention of optimisations on ARM gcc >producing broken code. Anything should be safe, but -O3 or higher will probably start to generate worse code than -O2. p. unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Paul Koning
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Adam 'WeirdArms' Wiggins
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc question Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: gcc question Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc quest... Ben Williamson
- Re: gcc quest... Philip Blundell
- Re: gcc quest... Ben Williamson
- Re: gcc quest... Philip Blundell
