Mark van Doesburg wrote:
> This might be usefull for expirimentation but I really don't want to
> have PCI stuff in my add-in EBSA285. The reason is very simple, I don't
> need it and IMHO PCI cards shouldn't deal with the PCI configuration
> space. Making PCI an option when building an add in kernel seems like a
> good idea if people want this kind of access.
>
I agree with you here - it should be an option just like in the other
kernel builds. I'd forgotton I had to force CONFIG_PCI to equal Yes
since its not selectable. If I recall correctly, the EBSA-285 needs to
look at the PCI configuration space if it wants to control another
card.
-Jon
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
