> From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Sep 20 15:53:48 1999
> Subject: Question: Code in head-armv.S
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm running an ebsa285-like system with 2.2.11-rmk1-stk1 (stk1 means
> some stuff specific to our board), and I'm seeing something strange.
> ... I've trace it to where the MMU is enabled. Here's the sequence:
> ...
>               mcr     p15, 0, r0, c1, c0      @ Enable MMU & caches.  In 3 
>instructions
>                                               @ we lose this page!
>               mov     pc, lr
 
I ran into a similar problem.  I'm actually using ARM Linux on a custom SW
simulator that mimics an ESBA285 w/ a StrongARM CPU.  I decided I wasn't
interested in hacking the simulator to try and duplicate the StrongARM's
non-deterministic MMU-enable behavior, so instead I modified head-armv.S
to create a direct virtual-physical mapping for the section containing
the instruction that enables the MMU.  I do this right after the page
table is cleared.

/*
 * r4 = page dir in physical ram
 * r5 = physical address of start of RAM
 * r6 = I/O address
 */
                mov     r0, r4
                mov     r3, #0
                add     r2, r0, #0x4000
1:              str     r3, [r0], #4              @ Clear page table
                teq     r0, r2
                bne     1b

/* JJS HACK -- add an entry to get us past the MMU being enabled. */

                mov     r3, #0x0c00;
                orr     r3, r3, #0x0e; 
                mov     r0, #0x4000;   
                str     r3, [r0];

Later on, as the kernel sets up the real page tables, it just overwrites
this entry.  I think this should work fine on real StrongARM HW.  I also
discovered at least one other place in the kernel where the MMU mapping
for the currently executing page changes, in the page table setup code.  
However, it looks like that case will always work because of the way its
surrounded by TLB flushing code.

At any rate, you might try some trick like this and see if it helps.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to