>> Don't do that, then - just configure and make at the top level. The gcc
>> subdirectory depends on other things such as libiberty that need to be built
>> first.
>
>What happens to all the bits of the compiler that depend on libc?
>Presumably it's impossible to reach a working `make install' target
>unless you inhibt make from considering these? Is `make LANGUAGES="c"'
>at the top level the correct way of doing this?
I don't think that will work. What you have to do is `make' at the top level,
wait for it to crash, then `make install' in the gcc subdirectory.
p.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
