>I guess 'elf32arm' should be changed by one of:=20
> armelf_linux
> armelf_linux26
> armelf
>What are the differences between these 3 values and which one should be used
>with all binutils-2.9.5.x ?
There is very little difference. The linker scripts for the three emulations
vary slightly but that's all. For ARM GNU/Linux you always want
`armelf_linux', or `armelf_linux26' for 26-bit hardware.
>Why not put a new OUTPUT_FORMAT() base on a derivative of "armelf"?
Actually, for the new linker the OUTPUT_FORMAT name would have to be
`elf32-littlearm'. Adding a line like that would be benign but useless --
the default is to use an appropriate format anyway.
p.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
