>The 2.3 CVS tree.
That certainly did contain 7500 support last time I looked, assuming you are
talking about the one at netwinder.org.
>I'd like it to be open-sourced, but I just don't see that this is possible
>with any RISC OS-based development system. Any changes would have to be
>hand-patched into the sources since there is no diff/patch utility that I
>am aware of, which makes it impractical.
It's several years since I used Acorn C but I thought it did come with a diff
program. Or one could use a Unix system for maintaining the source.
Regardless, this seems like a tangential issue to the question of whether to
actually release source or not. LinLoader is GPL'd so there is an existence
proof that RISC OS free software is possible.
p.
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++ Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ++
++ kernel-related discussions. ++
