Hanske;Stefan writes:
> I think that the following behaviour of gcc is intended, but it's strange
> that gcc uses only one register to return a long long value from a
> function and expands it in a curious way to be a 64-bit value again
> (something like mov r1, r0, asr #31).
>
> The following just won't work:
> <code removed>
Well, I've just tested it on the old gcc 2.7.2.2 and gcc 2.95.1, and it
works correctly with both of thoes compilers. I would suggest that you've
found a compiler bug!
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++ Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ++
++ kernel-related discussions. ++
