Hi, > Well, not exactly. ESD is mainly about mixing multiple outputs to > single audio device (network transparently). This isn't necessarily > needed for the audio routing API. We could start with something simple > like this: > Of course, for this to be useful, it would have to be widely accepted > (like LADSPA and MuCoS). ESD is already quasi standard, why not just extend esd with those features? Just add it to esd as an option. Alex
- [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA GUI Issues Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA GUI Issues Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA GUI Issues Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA GUI Issues (not just ... Alexander König
- [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (was: Re: LADS... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (was: ... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (w... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routi... Alexander Ehlert
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio r... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio r... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] aud... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (w... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (was: ... monty
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (was: ... David Slomin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (w... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] audio routing (w... David Olofson
- Sound output on LADSPA (was Re: [linux-audio-d... Jarno Seppanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA GUI Issues David Olofson