On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, David Olofson wrote:

> I think it's a good idea to have "soft" ranges, but I still think
> that the "recommended" range should be somewhat standardized, so that
> a wildly experimenting user can see some similarity in how different
[...]
> Signed:
>       -1.0 <= value <= 1.0
> Unsigned:
>       0.0 <= value <= 1.0

Hmm, I understand what you're aiming at. Still, I'd prefer to 
have meaningful control values. For instance, if I load 
a filter plugin, I want to specify the cutoff-freq using Hz 
(eg. 400Hz). You can always use the range recommendation to 
scale the control values to a more standard range....

Signed: -1.0 = range_low, 1.0 = range_high 
Unsigned: ...

-- 
Kai Vehmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux multitrack audio processing
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav

Reply via email to