Paul Barton-Davis wrote: > >I get about 4.5Mb of reads per second on my disk, either way. > > I hope you have an old disk. For 24bit/96kHz we need 9MB/sec > uni-directional transfer :) I do have an old disk :-) > >BTW, you might want to run them on a raw partition, and a > >filesystem, to compare performance. > > I've ruled out raw partitions, they seem evil in almost every way. I > know they'd be faster, but I don't care - the other losses seem to great. > For now :) Can't you let the user decide this? You could implement it quite transparently: ~/ardour/music-file could be a symlink to a partition. It *is* yucky, but try telling that to someone who can't fit the last track in :-) Andrew Clausen
- [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Andrew Clausen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Andrew Clausen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughp... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughput Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk throughp... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] hdr disk thr... Benno Senoner