Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
> >I get about 4.5Mb of reads per second on my disk, either way.
> 
> I hope you have an old disk. For 24bit/96kHz we need 9MB/sec
> uni-directional transfer :)

I do have an old disk :-)

> >BTW, you might want to run them on a raw partition, and a
> >filesystem, to compare performance.
> 
> I've ruled out raw partitions, they seem evil in almost every way. I
> know they'd be faster, but I don't care - the other losses seem to great.
> For now :)

Can't you let the user decide this?  You could implement it quite
transparently: ~/ardour/music-file could be a symlink to a partition.
It *is* yucky, but try telling that to someone who can't fit the
last track in :-)

Andrew Clausen

Reply via email to