On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, James McCartney wrote: > I prefer unions. > > fwiw, I have "float32" and "float64" typedefed in my code as types, so as > struct field names that is problematic.. > > Ok I will do my implementation with unions tomorrow. (looks like there is ZERO CPU overhead over using regular datatypes, nice) would uppercase letters be ok ? value.FLOAT32 = 123; Benno.
- [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel and multi-da... Benno Senoner
- [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA: unions vs pointers .. m... Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel and... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel... Richard Guenther
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel and... David Olofson
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel and... Richard W.E. Furse
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel... Benno Senoner
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multicha... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multichannel... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA with multicha... David Olofson
- Benno Senoner