>>This would result in a lot of incompatible >>conversion plugins as far as I can tell. I don't know about "incompatible" in this sense but there would not be conversion plug-ins from all types to all types. -*- My suggestion is that we don't fix the LADSPA before we have several tens of Csound opcodes converted to LADSPA. How can I put it more clearly: Knuth's TeX publishing program was not fixed until after the TeXBook was completed -- during writing the TeXBook with the TeX, Knuth improved greatly the TeX and found missing features. Writing plenty of plug-ins is not enough: We could fix LADSPA only when we have a few different kind of applications using it. Anyway, fixing LADSPA while people are still debating about features is not a good idea! Juhana
- [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Deadline Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Deadline Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Dead... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Deadline David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Deadline Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Dead... Karl W. MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation ... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisat... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisat... Karl W. MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Fina... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Fina... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation ... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Finalisation Dead... Erik Steffl