>Adopt VST2.0/FreeST as a low-level common denominator API. >Rename LADSPA to be "Extended FreeST" and make it a superset >of VST2.0 (or if not a proper superset, make it compatible >enought that LADSPA hosts can host VST2.0 plugins >transparently). > >Host implementors could then pick one of two levels >of support, and plugin writers could use the base >VST API when that is sufficient, moving >to the more complex level of support only when >necessary. This was precisely my suggestion. --p
- [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin API's: where are we... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin API's: whe... Jim Coker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin API's:... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin AP... Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugi... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin API's: whe... Richard Guenther
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin API's:... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugin AP... James McCartney
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugi... Jim Coker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio ... James McCartney
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Au... James McCartney
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio plugi... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux Audio ... Richard Guenther