Benno Senoner wrote:
> > >with their Posix.4 interval timers if you like.  If you're feeling
> > >political, find out why UTIME isn't in the kernel and get it there. :-)
> > 
> > True, this would be nice. 
> 
> Yes, I fully agree: WE STRONGLY need UTIME for demanding multimedia apps.
> 
> How about about to write a polite mail to Linus and friends, (representing the
> linux audio community) about the need of UTIME and the low-latency patches
> in standard kernels ?

I don't read linux-kernel, but I had the impression he/they said "fine
feature, but I don't like the implementation."  If that's not what they
said, whatever they said, we ought to address it in our letter.
Anybody know the story?

-- 
     Eli Brandt  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |  http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~eli/

Reply via email to