Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> >From: Stephane Conversy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >http://www-ihm.lri.fr/~conversy/q2ladspa.tar.gz
> >
> >butter.so* harmon.so* lowpassr.so* rtsin.so* svfilter.so*
> >dam.so* hilbert.so* resonz.so* spatializer2D.so* ugens5.so*
> >flanger.so* lfo.so* rtline.so* streson.so* wrap.so*
>
> OK, I see it! It comes times that there are only binary plug-ins available.
> As happened with sunsite years ago, can happen here: sunsite provided only
> precompiled binaries and developers had to search for sources with dogs.
> And only some of the binaries ever worked because they expected old
> libraries.
> And hey, I have not talked about ms-dog style executable habits yet....
> We start seeing binary distributions only, because it is so easy to slip
> out of GNU mentality to ms-dog style wanna-be-rich-shareware or they-might-
> steal-my-code grazyness.
>
> Juhana
I don't think there is any reason to get so carried away about it. I think we
all would love if the big dragons would start developing ladspa compatible
plugins for linux. If they ever do, they WILL be closed source I bet you. For me
this does not matter at all. Especially since the ladspa interface is so simple
it is very unlikely compatibility will be a problem.
/R
