Hi, Two small comments: > One feature I also wanted to mention was something Im calling > auto-mapping which is basically a collection of DSP proccesses and macro > filing tables that make recording huge amounts of samples more of a > reality than a chore. > 1.PITCH DETECTOR > [Detects the pitch of a recorded sample and files it in a temporary > keymap at the appropriate single zone automatically] Note that the sample might be 50 cents off. Should the filer first adjust the pitch? > 2.VELOCITY DETECTOR > [Detects the amplitude of each sample and stores it in a temporary keymap > at the appropriate velocity range automatically] I think the problem here is that you need to detect perceptual amplitude. Does anybody know good algoritms for that? Maarten
- [linux-audio-dev] EVO-Linux Physical Modeling HD Sampler larry d byrd
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO-Linux Physical Modeling HD... Maarten de Boer
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] EVO-Linux Physical Modelin... Juhana Sadeharju
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Physical Modeling HD... Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Physical Mod... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Physical... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Phys... Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux... Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-L... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Physical Mod... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Physical... Benno Senoner
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: EVO-Linux Phys... David Olofson