> the downsides, however, are obvious: updates to cdda2wav and cdrecord > then need source-level munging to catch. also, the process of merging > them is likely to be quite unpleasant. there is nothing in either > program to suggest that it has ever thought of being used in this > way. Do their upstreams use CVS? It's fairly easy to keep in sync that way. Will
- [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2wav & cdre... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2wav &... Will Lowe
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2wav &... Conrad Parker
- [linux-audio-dev] cdparanoia and restoration Juhana Sadeharju
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2wav &... Richard A. Smith
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2w... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cd... Richard A. Smith
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2w... Ned Judy
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2wav &... Andre Pang
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] opinion sought re: cdda2w... Paul Barton-Davis