>I actually use interfaces that complicated regularly, but it can be >intimidating. Do you think its noticably different from using a modular >synth? Granted synths have real knbos, but I was planning to draw >a background that made the divisions between the 'modules' clear, and >showed the routing order. Hmm. This will be an interesting test case for the XML stuff, once its done. I am not sure how you can show the routing. Background pixmaps aren't going to work for this, because you don't have any idea where anything is until its all packed up. I've been trying to look at libvstgui for some examples of how they layout the control objects, but its not very clear right now. --p
- [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml ... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa ... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] lad... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Erik Steffl
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Richard C. Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml ... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml ... Erik Steffl
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa ... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml gui Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa xml ... Erik Steffl