On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:17:03AM -0500, Paul Barton-Davis wrote: > No, you're not missing the point. I'm being mislead by Steve's use of > a non-portable trick in his plugins. He uses the "special" functions > _init() and _fini() to setup the bounds for his plugins. These are > recognized by the run-time linker, and as a result, his bounds are not > const. However, they are also not established at a point where SR is > known. Is that a bad idea? I got it from the plugins in the SDK. I can easily move it to a different stage, but it's not clear at what stage you need to have done it by. - Steve
- [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rate Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rat... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sa... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rat... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rat... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rat... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample rat... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sample... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA and plugin sa... Paul Barton-Davis