On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 04:46:00PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > although I did post a link here recently to some work done with Qt > designed to allow just that with GTK+. OTOH, it definitely ranks in > the "hack-of-all-hacks" category, and it was far from clear to me that > it was actually a desirable solution. indeed ... I'd never suggest anyone actually go and _do_ this voodoo ... like others around here, I'm quite happy with LADSPA the way it is, at the very least I don't think plugins should go around creating windows Conrad.
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec stat... Robert Jonsson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI ... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec stat... David Olofson
- [linux-audio-dev] [OT?] any linux problems usi... Richard Dobson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec stat... Conrad Parker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? pcburns
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? Conrad Parker
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec status? Daniel V.
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ladspa GUI spec stat... Steve Harris