At 15:21 4/3/2001 -0700, Simon Per Soren Kagedal wrote:
>Basically, yes, minus some bugs (overflowing the inbuffer...).
>
>short inbuffer[BUFSIZE], leftBuf[BUFSIZE/2]; /* or whatever type
> you have */
>read (sd, inbuffer, BUFSIZE);
>for (i=0; i<BUFSIZE/2; i++)
> leftBuf[i] = inbuffer[2*i] * gain;
>write (file_d, leftBuf, BUFSIZE/2);
doh, I didn't even think about it.
>I don't really see what you mean but sure, of course you could as well
>in the above example change BUFSIZE to BUFSIZE*2 and BUFSIZE/2 to
>BUFSIZE... Doesn't really matter. :)
I just didn't know why the code writer did it this way. I thought it might
be some kinda weird rounding deal.
:)
thanks-
ljp
