>We need an architecture that move interest of developers from to write >an application to write a component, this is IMO a fundamental thing. > >Often I feel that Paul is too focused on a single >problem/application/solution This is certainly possible. But if its true, then I think you should have a good explanation for why Steinberg's approach (3 different API's for different tasks) was taken. Was it lack of time? Lack of concern for the future? Stupidity? When I look at other audio application environments, I see monoliths+plugins. I this just a hangover from the lack of The Unix Way(TM) on Windows and MacOS? Or is it based on some real understanding of how best to go about this? --p
- [linux-audio-dev] laaga, round 2 Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] laaga, round 2 Abramo Bagnara
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] laaga, round... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laag... Abramo Bagnara
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: ... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel]... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] ... Jay Ts
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laaga, r... Kai Vehmanen
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laag... Abramo Bagnara
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: ... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel]... Abramo Bagnara
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: laaga, round 2 Alexander Ehlert
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: laaga, round ... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: laaga, round 2 Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: laaga, r... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: laaga, round ... Stefan Westerfeld
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laaga, r... Jim Peters
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] Re: laag... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [alsa-devel] ... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] laaga, round 2 Jay Ts
