>>> Paul already suggested to extend this design by allowing clients for >>> getting 'available_channels() type information from the server. But I'm >>> still not sure if this is needed. I'd like to concentrate on just >> We need it just as "static" counts, so that the UI for the >> server-plugin can present a useful set of choices to the user. > >Just to make sure we are not talking about different things, what do you >exactly mean by 'server-plugin'? a plugin for a LAAGA server. i was just trying to distinguish it from, say, a LADSPA plugin. --p
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Karl MacMillan
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - ho... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - how are we doing ? Iain Sandoe
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - how are we doing ? Tom Pincince
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - how are we doing ? Vincent Touquet
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAAGA - how are we doing ? Paul Davis
