Jim Peters wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">As much as I'd love to involve myself in this discussion I have had to stay out of it mainly due to lack of time. But there is also one more important issue that I felt I wanted to comment.Paul Davis wrote:(lots of stuff)
Basically, my heart is sinking. You're very confident that everything
is fine with your approach, but I know very well that it will cause
problems down the line. But if you can't see that, what can I do ?
Either vanish quietly or enter into heated discussions, but either way
nothing much changes if neither one of us budges.
Mail discussion is nice, but in itself it seldomly results in anything constructive, however entertaining. It can also be easy to misunderstand and misinterpret things, I know from personal experience that it has happened way to many times. We all have different value grounds which we base the discussion on, lack of realtime/pictures/gestures/eye contact further obfuscates the argumentation.
To me the only real alternative, which also gives something to discuss _around_, is _actual implementation_.
The more the merrier :-). It gives common ground to discuss even further, plus it would rather quickly prove whether concepts do work.
There are _some_ preliminary work done (right?), well we should start testing them shant we?
And if there aren't; Get coding! :-)
/Robert
