On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:57:22PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > Steve - i did some more calibration of your code with rdtsc. > > the proc() call takes about 3500 instructions to execute. on my > system, thats about 5usec. the time between SIGUSR1 being received by > the main process averages about 80usec. as i understand your code, > this is basically the time it would take a "server" to tell a "client" > that it had work to do, for the client to do 5usec of computation, and > then tell the server it was done and for us to be back in the server > process. this is on an unloaded (zero length run queue, no memory > pressure) dual PII-450. So thats aproximatly 75us penalty for each pair of signals? Thats certainly to much. Its about 50,000 instructions which sounds very high, what's the kernel doing in that time? - Steve
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level ... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level ... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high le... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level ... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high le... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high le... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Jim Peters
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Steve Harris
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] costs of IPC Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
