On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:22:55AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > And just as a reminder: if you look at the available VST FX and > instruments, its hard to argue that there are any kind of audio > "components" that can't be implemented with VST; LADSPA is essentially > VST 1.0 done slightly "cleaner". And with a gui. (sorry to sound like a stuck record, but no gui seriously limits what you can do). - Steve
- [linux-audio-dev] Pragmatic comparison of approaches to aud... Abramo Bagnara
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: Pragmatic comparison of approach... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Pragmatic comparison of ... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Pragmatic comparison... Karl MacMillan
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: Pragmatic comparison of appr... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Pragmatic comparison... Paul Davis
- [linux-audio-dev] An attempt to a simpler,... Steve Harris
- [linux-audio-dev] An attempt to a simpler,... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Pragmatic comparison of approach... Kai Vehmanen
