Karl MacMillan wrote:
> 
> > > Other bonus of a single API are:
> > > - component reuse
> > > - greater flexybility
> > > - true modularity
> > > - etc. (we've analyzed deeply that in previous postings)
> >
> > Agreed, these are usually good things.
> >
> 
> These are good goals, but using one api for two tasks (hardware access and
> inter-process communication) does not necessarily help this.

My API does not implement inter-process communication. It makes it
feasible, it's very different.

> I agree with this.  It seems like you have an analogy in mind that I don't
> quite understand (even after your other mail about the gears).  Some more
> explicit documentation would help me understood the goals and strengths of
> your api.

I'll try to find the time to write something more asap.

-- 
Abramo Bagnara                       mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opera Unica                          Phone: +39.546.656023
Via Emilia Interna, 140
48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy

ALSA project               http://www.alsa-project.org
It sounds good!

Reply via email to