On Tue, 22 May 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> Karl MacMillan wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 May 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > This has a large number of unnecessary buffer copies that probably will
> > > > not scale well. Have you looked at the other proposals that reduce buffer
> > > > copying?
> > >
> > > Buffer copies?? Are you sure to have followed the thread?
> > > We are speaking about controls (in this specific case connections map).
> > >
> >
> > Ooops - you are right I misunderstood the context.
> >
> > > I've two copy of a topology area every time user change it, this makes
> > > you worry?
> > >
> >
> > Hmmm . . . after thinking about this further I still don't understand how
> > this solves the problem that Paul was raising (I looked over the context
> > of these emails).
>
> I've simply presented a better way to solve the same problem (Paul
> presented a solution too).
>
> The general problem was "how to change engine work parameter from the
> external without to force an engine stop, without to mess engine structs
> with partially written settings, in an efficient way".
>
I am saying that I don't see how what you have proposed solves the problem
that Paul put forth.
Karl
> --
> Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023
> Via Emilia Interna, 140
> 48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
>
> ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org
> It sounds good!
>
_____________________________________________________
| Karl W. MacMillan |
| Computer Music Department |
| Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| mambo.peabody.jhu.edu/~karlmac |
-----------------------------------------------------
