On 5/9/07, Dave Robillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Regarding the one sensible thing you /have/ said: is sample rate as a double sufficient, or is there a good reason for numerator/denominator (that outweighs the PITA for the plugin author)?
I'll play "dumb user" on this one... Are there useful sample rates that can be expressed more accurately with a pair of 32-bit integers than by a double? If so, programmers who don't care about the extra accuracy could presumably convert the ratio to a double in one line of code (at the cost of a single division operation). That does not seem excessive, assuming there are real-world examples where the extra accuracy would help. Are there any? -- joq _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
