======= On Monday 04 June 2007, Lars Luthman wrote: ======= ... > It may be cheaper to downsample from 88.2 kHz - just use a brickwall > filter and then throw away every odd sample. I don't think that's reason > enough for using it though, downsampling is presumably a one-time job > that isn't all that urgent. > > > --ll >
======= On Monday 04 June 2007, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: ======= ... > If you are using the secret rabbit code SINC based (or any other > "correct" resampler) to do the resampling, then the only advantage > of 88k2 is that it uses slight less disk space. > > When using crappy resamplers (ie linear resamplers, including the > one in secret rabbit code), they may be slightly less bad at doing > 88k2 -> 44k1 than 96k -> 44k1. > > HTH, > Erik Lars, Erik, thanks! I concluded, I can use 96K, SRC and forget about the issue. Andrew _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
