On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 15:31 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've been working with the 2.6 series kernel now for some time with > satisfactory > results ie (about 24 msec of latency and solid stability). I chose the 2.6 > series because its the latest, and I wouldn't have to patch as much to get > support for my hardware (firewire alsa realtime etc...). But I've been reading > more and more about how the 2.4 kernels can outperform 2.6 when patched > properly, > any truth to this?
no truth. its an old data point, no longer valid. that is, assuming we are talking about RT-patched 2.6 vs. RT-patched 2.4. if you mean vanilla 2.6 vs. RT-patched 2.4, the latter is still better. --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
