On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:23 +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote: > hi all, > > i'm not really familiar with the ladspa development process, but is > there any quality assurance for ladspa plugins? > > i have been implementing some of my filters as ladspa plugins, but when > trying to compare them with others, i found, that some of the plugins > did not do, what i expected them to do (a white noise generator did not > generate white noise, a shelf filter was highly unstable when changing > parameters) ... > > of course, all plugins are free (as in speech), without any warranty, > but i still think, that there should be a certain amount of quality > assurance, if we want people to use the ladspa plugins ...
It's not just LADSPA plugins: http://osdir.com/ml/audio.jackit/2003-02/msg00202.html That message is from 2003, but I don't think the situation has improved dramatically since then. --ll
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
