Regarding this whole audio over Cat5 thread, do we actually understand what the 
objective is of this exercise / project?  Is the original authors use of 
terminology such that we know what is actually supposed to be achieved?

When I first read this, I thought the idea was to produce some sort of 
network-transported audio stream, like that of a video stream, something which 
could be "listened to" by some network-connected client computer with its own 
audio output hardware.  Since routers themselves have no speakers, I could not 
reach any other conclusion.  Now it sounds more like a hack to get packets to 
somehow generate audio as a byproduct ... kind of like the audio version of 
streaming video via ASCII on a character terminal.  Or a better analogy would 
be getting the old PC "speaker" to emit discernible sounds by sending digital 
data to it's IO port.

It reminds me of a story my uncle the television engineer told me about how 
there was a scrap pile of old bolts and cables lying on the floor in the corner 
of the antenna-transmitter shack of the VHF TV station where he was chief 
engineer for a number of years before he retired.  One day, after replacing a 
couple of guy wire mounting brackets on the tower (a tower of about 1200'), he 
threw the scrap hardware on the junk pile in the shack.  Suddenly, he could 
hear the audio signal for the station coming out of the junk pile.  He tried to 
leave the pile undisturbed after that to preserve the effect, but eventually 
someone bumped or otherwise changed the pile and it stopped "working".

Sorry, I digress.  So tell me again ... what is the real goal of this project?

- Doug H

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev

Reply via email to