David Olofson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Also most lock free algorithms are patented so this can be point of >> host supporting only one feature set. > > You shouldn't need any lock-free constructs, unless I'm missing > something... Is it a requirement that real time safe allocations can > be done in other threads than the real time audio thread?
You dont missin anything. I think you are right about lock-free algorithms in rt-safe memory manager. I said a non-sense. -- Nedko Arnaudov _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
