On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 14:55 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > Lars Luthman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 05:59 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > >> Also, i doubt we need three "count" members in Event_Port_Buffer > >> structure. used_size - number of used events is perfectly fine by > >> itself. I dont see why plugin should know whether buffer is actually > >> larger. > > > > It needs to know that for an output buffer. > > Well, port is either input or output, why not use same variable/member > (with appropriate naming)?
You could, but there isn't really much to gain from it. The host will want to keep track of the buffer capacity in some way so those 4 bytes have to go somewhere, and I think having the same variable mean different things for input and output buffers makes things more confusing. --ll
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
